[178772] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: optical gear cooling requirements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Naslund, Steve)
Wed Mar 4 16:38:03 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund@medline.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:37:58 +0000
In-Reply-To: <op.xuzrhvd6tfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I remember that there was an Ascend DSLAM built on the same chassis and it =
was collocated by someone into Ameritech central offices. Ameritech shut t=
hem all down saying that there was no way, no how that the device could be =
NEBS compliant. I don't know how that fight ever turned out, they were not=
ours. Side to side airflow is really bad news. Even with vertical you co=
uld at least mount some kind of baffles and lose a few Us. With side to sid=
e it is really hard to find a way to redirect air with the flanges in the w=
ay.
Steven Naslund
Chicago IL
> Remember the Ascend MAX TNT and the sideways left-right airflow?
>...
