[178729] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Colin Johnston)
Tue Mar 3 12:10:09 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <910423432.4454.1425399627062.JavaMail.zimbra@pelican.org>
From: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 17:09:58 +0000
To: Tim Franklin <tim@pelican.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
fttc in uk works great for client code push remote installs , even faster th=
an some offices since the fibre nodes are less contended.
seen 18mb up work fine and sustained with voip in parallel as well
colin
Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Mar 2015, at 16:20, Tim Franklin <tim@pelican.org> wrote:
>> I meant that on the Internet as a whole it is unusual for such speeds to
>> actually be realized in practice due to various issues.
>>=20
>> 8-10Mb/s seems to be what one can expect without going to distributed
>> protocols.
>=20
> Really? I have 2 x VDSL (40/10) to my house, running MLPPP. I can get a s=
ustained 60M down or 15M up on a single stream without a lot of difficulty. =
It does typically need both ends to be aware of window scaling, or you star=
t to run up against the LFN problem, but other than that it's nothing beyond=
regular HTTP, FTP, SCP, CIFS, ...
>=20
> 15M upstream *utterly* transforms working from home where all the files I'=
m working on are on a remote file server. Autosave is no longer a cue for a=
5-10 minute tea-break.
>=20
> Regards,
> Tim.
