[178535] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Clark)
Sat Feb 28 10:46:08 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:46:03 -0500
From: Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com>
To: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>, Daniel Taylor <dtaylor@vocalabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrdfRxNWRHmHVF0GazhYX5kvZ3=g1UZ8kw5xQHEgJ3YiO0b7Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Securence-RFC2821-MAIL-FROM: sclark@netwolves.com
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On 02/27/2015 04:11 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
> Daniel,
>
>
> "50MB/s might be tough to fill, but even at home I can get good use out of
> the odd 25MB/s upstream burst for a few minutes."
>
> Which would you choose, 50/50 or 75/25?  My point is not that upstream
> speed isn't valuable, but merely that demand for it isn't symmetrical and
> unless the market changes won't be in the near term.  Downstream demand is
> growing, in most markets I can see, much faster than upstream demand.
Scott,

Who can foresee what APPs might come about if uplinks speeds weren't so low. I liken it to
whoever said no one will ever need more than 640KB of memory.

Regards,
Steve
>
> Scott Helms
> Vice President of Technology
> ZCorum
> (678) 507-5000
> --------------------------------
> http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
> --------------------------------
>


-- 
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post