[178515] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sat Feb 28 00:09:46 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <54F14AE2.9000006@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:07:10 -0800
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


> On Feb 27, 2015, at 20:58 , Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 27/Feb/15 19:48, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>> How about this?  Show me 10 users in the average neighborhood =
creating content at 5 mbps....Period.  Only realistic app I see is home =
surveillance but I don't think you want everyone accessing that anyway.  =
The truth is that the average user does not create content that anyone =
needs to see.  This has not changed throughout the ages, the ratio of =
authors to readers, artists to art lovers, musicians to music lovers, =
YouTube cat video creator to cat video lovers, has never been a many to =
many relationship.
>=20
> The neighborhood getting together on Facetime to plot how to spend =
their
> days after the husbands have gone off to work comes to mind.
>=20
> But wait...
>=20
> Mark.

Even in that case, Mark, you have a conference call where each person is =
sending a stream out to a rendezvous point that is then sending it back =
to N people where N is the number of people in the chat -1. So the =
downstream bandwidth will be N*upstream for each of them.

Owen


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post