[178490] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (deleskie@gmail.com)
Fri Feb 27 18:36:28 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:28:11 -0400
From: deleskie@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAORNjypWWuibnRLTnCmJBmwq9vGbw6inw7GsLKNQ68-cDtkDgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Richardson <weaselkeeper@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I wonder if lawyer sit around all day and argue about CIDR notation
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
=A0 Original Message =A0
From: Jim Richardson
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 7:26 PM
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: What is lawful content? [was VZ...]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wro=
te:
> I am not a lawyer (in fact, I Am Not An Isp), but my understanding is thi=
s is pretty well settled.
>
> And it is not even weird or esoteric. If the content on the site is again=
st the law in the jurisdiction in question, it is not legal (duh). Otherwis=
e, yes it is, and no ISP gets to decide whether you can see it or not.
Which is the "jurisdiction in question" ? the originating website? the
ISP? the CDN network's corporate home? my home?
