[178473] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James R Cutler)
Fri Feb 27 17:46:27 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: James R Cutler <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrdfRxNWRHmHVF0GazhYX5kvZ3=g1UZ8kw5xQHEgJ3YiO0b7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:31:06 -0500
To: Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--Apple-Mail=_63A2B0C3-0D87-4C7F-A3D0-8E1207C60E6D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Scott Helms <khelms@zcorum.com> wrote:
>=20
> My point is not that upstream
> speed isn't valuable, but merely that demand for it isn't symmetrical =
and
> unless the market changes won't be in the near term. Downstream =
demand is
> growing, in most markets I can see, much faster than upstream demand.
The demand may not be symmetrical, but where demand exists, it is often =
for symmetrical speeds.
Side note: Did I not read that asymmetric paths tend to exacerbate =
Buffer Bloat?
James R. Cutler
James.cutler@consultant.com
PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu
--Apple-Mail=_63A2B0C3-0D87-4C7F-A3D0-8E1207C60E6D
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.26
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iEYEARECAAYFAlTw8DUACgkQHzETiNcaVPnA+wCdFAumiDV8MGexJxhHbOFmNVmT
NJQAnA+FRsJcIzghYdwzbWP4WjGDuZ/L
=L6Gx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_63A2B0C3-0D87-4C7F-A3D0-8E1207C60E6D--
