[178368] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Feb 27 12:11:01 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:45:11 -0600."
<13952758.7865.1425055485506.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:05:52 -0500
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1425056752_1873P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:45:11 -0600, Mike Hammett said:
> What about ISPs that aren't world-class dicks?
That's unfortunately a very YMMV problem. For instance, Comcast has (so far)
provided the bandwidth I pay for, deployed very usable IPv6, not screwed up my
bill, and the few times I've had to deal with their support structure it's gone
amazingly smoothly. However, I'm told that other people have wildly divergent
user experiences with them... :)
--==_Exmh_1425056752_1873P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=FNVQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1425056752_1873P--
