[178351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Fisher)
Fri Feb 27 10:56:57 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <54F08428.4000705@invaluement.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:56:51 -0500
From: Scott Fisher <littlefishguy@gmail.com>
To: Rob McEwen <rob@invaluement.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I am not arguing that they have a valid complaint. I just think their
method of doing so is a bit childish. It does get the point across,
just not in the method I respect. Just my opinion though.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Rob McEwen <rob@invaluement.com> wrote:
> Scott Fisher,
>
> I think Verizon's statement was brilliant, and entirely appropriate. Some
> people are going to have a hard time discovering that being in favor of
> Obama's version of "net neutrality"... will soon be just about as cool as
> having supported SOPA.
>
> btw - does anyone know if that thick book of regulations, you know... those
> hundreds of pages we weren't allowed to see before the vote... anyone know
> if that is available to the public now? If so, where?
>
> Rob McEwen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Scott Fisher <littlefishguy@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Funny, but in my honest opinion, unprofessional. Poor PR.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/fccs-throwback-thursday-move-imposes-1930s-rules-on-the-internet
>
>
--
Scott
