[178345] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Fri Feb 27 09:55:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:55:02 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <54F08428.4000705@invaluement.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
They won't be available for days, weeks, months, etc. After the vote, they are subject to editorial review... which isn't so much editorial as whatever the hell they want. They could just be literally adding commas and capitalizing letters to completely changing the language of something.
Whenever that day comes...
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob McEwen" <rob@invaluement.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 8:50:16 AM
Subject: Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
Scott Fisher,
I think Verizon's statement was brilliant, and entirely appropriate.
Some people are going to have a hard time discovering that being in
favor of Obama's version of "net neutrality"... will soon be just about
as cool as having supported SOPA.
btw - does anyone know if that thick book of regulations, you know...
those hundreds of pages we weren't allowed to see before the vote...
anyone know if that is available to the public now? If so, where?
Rob McEwen
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Scott Fisher <littlefishguy@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Funny, but in my honest opinion, unprofessional. Poor PR.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Larry Sheldon <larrysheldon@cox.net> wrote:
>> http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/fccs-throwback-thursday-move-imposes-1930s-rules-on-the-internet
