[17828] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Dijkstra Simulator
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Wilson)
Sat Jun 13 00:58:30 1998
From: Rob Wilson <rwilson@supernews.com>
Reply-To: "rwilson@supernews.com" <rwilson@supernews.com>
To: "'Alan Hannan'" <alan@globalcenter.net>, Jim Boyle <jim.boyle@l3.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 21:15:24 -0700
Was that Exodus again.... Didn't you guys already take most of their clients anyway??
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Hannan [SMTP:alan@globalcenter.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 1998 8:23 PM
To: Jim Boyle
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Dijkstra Simulator
> p.s. - how is that ip navigator treating you - is there any other than the
> big C? (oops -that's little c, isn't it?).
frontier globalcenter is not planning to use ip navigator in the
core of our network today.
we are moving away from ip/atm and towards ip/sonet&ip/wdm. We
have 1 oc12 using packet over sonet up today, and several oc3s; phased
deployment of oc12 and oc48 starting 3Q98 and completed in 1Q99.
we are exploring using ip navigator in our l2 aggregation frame
and atm networks.
big C/A,J,T,L,N little c they all have reasonable products, just
some are more reasonable than others.
what really burns me is when a company we are working with under
nda tells our competition what we are exploring, and when they
publish press releases about their customers without that
customers approval.
-alan
