[178235] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Feb 20 17:07:30 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 00:06:53 +0200
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20150220113959.GA8476@pob.ytti.fi>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 20/Feb/15 13:39, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> Is there 4PE implementation to drive IPv4 edges, shouldn't be hard to accept
> IPv6 next-hop in BGP LU, but probably does not work out-of-the-box?
> Isn't Segment Routing implementation day1 IPV4+IPV6 in XR?
The last time I checked, MPLS support in SR for IPv6 is not a high
priority, compared to TE for IPv4 MPLS.
My thoughts that SR would automatically mean native label signaling in
IS-IS and OSPFv3 were otherwise ambitious.
Mark.
