[178227] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Durack)
Fri Feb 20 13:00:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <627266B72B856946BCD625D4B34B1916A31F96@INF-EXCH-MB-02.gammatelecom.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:00:39 -0500
From: Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com>
To: Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky@gamma.co.uk>
Cc: Juniper-Nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>,
"cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky@gamma.co.uk
> wrote:
> > Of Tim Durack
> > Sent: 20 February 2015 14:00
> > IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.
> >
>
> And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network
> operators.
>
> adam
>
>
> ------------------------------
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely
> by Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ------------------------------
>
I don't consider unique addressing of infrastructure a whim.
--
Tim:>
