[178219] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Durack)
Fri Feb 20 09:00:10 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20150220113959.GA8476@pob.ytti.fi>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:00:07 -0500
From: Tim Durack <tdurack@gmail.com>
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>,
Juniper-Nsp <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>,
"cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
> On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote:
>
> > What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite
> like
> > to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget...
> >
> > (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last
> > piece for me.)
>
> Is there 4PE implementation to drive IPv4 edges, shouldn't be hard to
> accept
> IPv6 next-hop in BGP LU, but probably does not work out-of-the-box?
> Isn't Segment Routing implementation day1 IPV4+IPV6 in XR?
>
> --
> ++ytti
>
I would gladly take OSPFv2/OSPFv3/ISIS+SR over LDP, but I'm seeing that is
not all that is needed.
I also need some flavor of L2VPN (eVPN) and L3VPN (VPNv4/VPNv6) working
over IPv6.
IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic.
--
Tim:>
