[178169] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Loron)
Wed Feb 18 18:44:30 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:44:28 -0800
From: Peter Loron <peterl@standingwave.org>
To: Robert Webb <rwebb@ropeguru.com>
In-Reply-To: <6kuidte0ccrph68sp1cmbrwy.1424300924779@email.android.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG
list'" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an
issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included
ethernet.
-Pete
On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
> What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
> and thus limited to USB speeds.
>
> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
> <mcole.mailinglists@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM
> (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'"
> <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
> for remote offices. </div><div>
> </div>
