[178154] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?Q?Anders_L=C3=B6winger?=)
Wed Feb 18 11:10:33 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20150218154522.GA8569@cmadams.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:10:30 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Anders_L=C3=B6winger?= <anders@abundo.se>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I really like the Intel NUC. Standard x86 hardware, multiple choices of
CPUs, runs debian/ubuntu/fedora etc with zero modifications.
/Anders
MVH / Regards
Anders L=C3=B6winger
Founder, Senior Consultant
Abundo AB
Murkelgr=C3=A4nd 6
94471 Pite=C3=A5http://abundo.se
office: +46 911 400021
mobile: +46 72 206 0322
2015-02-18 16:45 GMT+01:00 Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net>:
> Once upon a time, Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> said:
> > The Pi is low-powered in more ways than one. Last fall I ran some
> > (admittedly fairly simple minded) DNS benchmarks against a Raspberry
> > Pi Model B and an ODROID U3.
>
> The Pi is not really the right tool for any "production" job IMHO. Even
> if you are restricting yourself to cheap single-board ARM systems, there
> are better choices like BeagleBone, Cubieboard, etc. If you need a
> little more power (and want x86 to make things easier), go for a
> Minnowboard or the like. All of these are "hobbiest" solutions though.
>
> If you want cheap and compact DNS for a not-too-high request rate, just
> get a cheap wifi router that'll run a flavor of Open Source firmware (I
> prefer OpenWRT). Disable the wifi and run dnsmasq or bind (peruse the
> OpenWRT supported device page to check RAM capacity).
>
> Beyond that, or if you want a rack-mount solution, get an Atom CPU based
> barebones, like a SuperMicro, use an SSD, and it'll be relatively quiet
> (and at least the SuperMicros have IPMI built in for remote management).
>
> --
> Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net>
>
