[178001] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Intellectual Property in Network Design
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Feb 12 07:43:37 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:42:07 +0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+nanog@eintellegonetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEUfUGP5gtO9j+wDXYRJ+AVP+GbaCcSJ07btV7xFbYkk7tdpTg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> I'm keen to see how you might think that fits in to the context?
>> creative commons
i prefer to be paid for being able to think, not for what i once
thought. creative commons suits my needs for network designs.
randy
---
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
