[177842] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Crawford, Scott)
Fri Feb 6 12:59:47 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Crawford, Scott" <CrawfordS@evangel.edu>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:57:37 +0000
In-Reply-To: <6D484C0A-8BB8-4145-AC95-2F9C9D8961CD@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 30, 2015, at 07:37 , Owen DeLong <owen@delong> wrote:
> /48 for all customer sites is not at all unreasonable and is fully suppor=
ted by ARIN policy.
>Where Bill is correct is that some customers may have more than one site. =
The official
>policy definition of a site is a single building or structure, or, in the =
case of a multi-tenant
>building or structure, a single tenant within that building. Yes, this cou=
ld technically
>mean that a college dorm contains thousands of sites and could justify tho=
usands of /48s.
Is this your recommendation for colleges? Or, are you simply pointing out a=
possible interpretation of ARIN policy?
