[177749] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ray Soucy)
Wed Feb 4 08:31:54 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <FA429D1C-771E-4401-85F8-DCE9ABDB8CA5@nashnetworks.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:31:46 -0500
From: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
To: Paul Nash <paul@nashnetworks.ca>
Cc: Untitled 3 <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Honestly, in a lot of cases you don't even need a device to support
packet capture as a feature to add it as a feature once its
compromised. This is just FUD IMHO.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Paul Nash <paul@nashnetworks.ca> wrote:
>> I love the built-in remote packet captures,
>
> You, the NSA, and lots and lots of hackers, ALL love the remote packet ca=
pture. If Meraki support can turn it on, so can someone who penetrates the=
ir systems (by getting a job there or by hacking), and then they get to see=
everything happening INSIDE your network. Not just your WAN traffic, whic=
h would be bad enough.
>
> paul
--=20
Ray Patrick Soucy
Network Engineer
University of Maine System
T: 207-561-3526
F: 207-561-3531
MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network
www.maineren.net
