[177716] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dennis Bohn)
Sun Feb 1 09:42:22 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <DC85D08B84BB854086E9524DAB67D18726F6CBB3@Teriwood.miller.local>
From: Dennis Bohn <bohn@adelphi.edu>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 09:41:52 -0500
To: "Eric C. Miller" <eric@ericheather.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
We are substantially larger and use Aruba, but I am wondering why no one
has mentioned Meraki (now cisco-meraki). We tried one of their give-away
aps and it seemed fine, with the 'cloud management.' I am not advocating
Meraki, just curious.
best,
Dennis Bohn
Manager of Network and Systems
Adelphi University
bohn@adelphi.edu
5168773327
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Eric C. Miller <eric@ericheather.com>
wrote:
> +1 Xirrus, especially for the multi radio arrays. Crowded common areas
> benefit from sector antennas attached to individual radios. Also, there X=
MS
> server is really useful for managing a large cluster. Ubiquiti UniFi is
> good for smaller installations, but I wouldn't trust them for enterprise
> level reliability.
>
>
>
> Eric Miller, CCNP
> Network Engineering Consultant
> (407) 257-5115
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Lyon
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:17 AM
> To: Manuel Mar=C3=ADn
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
>
> Check out Xirrus
> On Jan 28, 2015 9:08 PM, "Manuel Mar=C3=ADn" <mmg@transtelco.net> wrote:
>
> > Dear nanog community
> >
> > I was wondering if you can recommend or share your experience with APs
> > that you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend
> > recommended me Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share
> > your experience with Ruckus or with a similar vendor. My experience
> > with ubiquity for this type of requirement was not that good.
> >
> > Thank you and have a great day
> >
>
