[177703] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Fri Jan 30 21:08:03 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <B359A784-EE00-485F-BD6A-5EB83C75ED1E@delong.com>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 21:07:25 -0500
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> I guess it depends on your definition of ubiquitous, but to me, when a protocol
> has the majority of the deployed addresses, I think it counts for this purpose.
LOL, Owen, IPv6 had that with the first /64 ethernet LAN it was used on.
How about this: when Verizon starts decommissioning its IPv4
infrastructure on the basis that IPv6 is widespread enough to no
longer require the expense of dual-stack, IPv6 will have achieved
ubiquity.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
