[177656] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: cable modem firmware upgrade
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Seastrom)
Fri Jan 30 06:48:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Paul Stewart" <paul@paulstewart.org>
From: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:48:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <011701d03bad$86476030$92d62090$@paulstewart.org> (Paul Stewart's
message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2015 05:22:44 -0500")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
"Paul Stewart" <paul@paulstewart.org> writes:
> That has been my experience as well (only from the RF side) and I would
> believe this was a design choice. The ISP usually wants to keep control
> over the firmware versions of the CM for various technical/support reasons
> versus having consumers mess with the firmware.
15 years ago, in certain circles it was well-understood how to load
one's own (possibly patched) software from the Ethernet side on the
old LanCity (pre-DOCSIS) cablemodems.
You can imagine what kind of hilarity ensued.
-r