[177607] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Alerting systems, Logicmonitor and/or alternatives

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Burkholder)
Wed Jan 28 18:15:50 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-OneUnified-MailScanner-From: ray@oneunified.net
From: "Raymond Burkholder" <ray@oneunified.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <54C92522.7060301@west.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:15:30 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> What's the collective opinion here? Is anyone using them or a similar ser=
vice?
> Are there non-cloud-based alternatives that are relatively easy to set up=
 and
> manage? We've explored Zabbix, Nagios, MRTG and its various wrappers,
> and Intermapper. Anything else new on the horizon that has a GUI front-end
> that is configurable without a lot of scripting experience, etc.?

Try OMD.  It packages a python wrapper called check_mk around Nagios and ad=
ds on charts via an already integrated pnp4nagios.=20=20

The guys doing check_mk have done an amazing job of harnessing the power of=
 Nagios through the use of configuration files which nicely minimizes the a=
mount of work necessary for getting things monitored, while maximizing how =
things are grouped and structured.

Since I like it so much, I'm in the process of migrating our monitoring fro=
m a combination of NagiosXI, Observium, and Cacti over to the OMD package.=
=20

It has fast agents for monitoring vsphere.  Has native agents for Linux and=
 Windows.  And can do SNMP.  And has good customization for those who want =
more done that what is supplied out of the box.

>=20
> We would love to buy something that works for us and pay a reasonable
> price for it, but I'm not particularly interested in the equivalent of re=
nting a
> time-share in order to monitor our networks.

Check_mk has support and professional services available.  It is open sourc=
e for those who wish to go the DIY route.

Raymond

blog.raymond.burkholder.net


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post