[177369] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Brocade MLX Feedback

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jordan Medlen)
Wed Jan 14 14:26:03 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jordan Medlen <jordan-medlen@bisk.com>
To: Graham Johnston <johnstong@westmancom.com>, "'nanog@nanog.org'"
 <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:25:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: <49EE1A35457387418410F97564A3752B013663B7F7@MSG6.westman.int>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

These are great routers. I used the MLX16s in the same capacity, before the=
 newer model MLXe with upgraded management card specs. Should work just fin=
e for that.

Thank you,

Jordan Medlen
Network Engineer
Bisk Education, Inc.



-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Graham Johnston
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 2:10 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: Brocade MLX Feedback

We are looking at Brocade MLX routers to act as Internet edge routers.  The=
y will initially handle two to four full tables, plus peering on an IX.  Th=
e price is certainly attractive.  We are coming from Cisco 7600 series devi=
ces.  Can anyone comment about their use of them?  Are you happy with them?=
  Any gotchas?  Particularly we are interested in convergence time to full =
FIB population.

Thanks,
Graham Johnston
Network Planner
Westman Communications Group
204.717.2829
johnstong@westmancom.com<mailto:johnstong@westmancom.com>
P think green; don't print this email.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post