[177298] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DDOS solution recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Mon Jan 12 04:19:26 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:19:00 +0100
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
To: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <5A6E09C5-ED1C-4DB5-9E48-74F54D5C5131@arbor.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* "Roland Dobbins" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
> On 11 Jan 2015, at 20:52, Ca By wrote:
>
> > 3. Have RTBH ready for some special case.
>
> S/RTBH and/or flowspec are better (S/RTBH does D/RTBH, too).
But are there any transit providers that support flowspec these days?
As I understand it, only GTT used to, but they stopped.
I'd love to use flowspec over D/RTBH, but to me it seems like
vapourware.
Tore