|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:51:14 +0100 From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> To: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> In-Reply-To: <32356202.1925.1420987613770.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:46:40AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: > Is anyone maintaining a list of good, bad and ugly providers in terms > of how seriously they take things they should like BCP38 and community > support and whatever else that's quantifiable? This list sheds some light on antispoofing commitments made by various providers: https://www.routingmanifesto.org/participants/ Kind regards, Job
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |