[177241] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DDOS solution recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles N Wyble)
Sat Jan 10 19:21:29 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD0TWZ9X2-g0gC2HHu+ZVxy8mwMOiguhRq4zoS+6tCe1uqzxSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles N Wyble <charles@thefnf.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:19:22 -0600
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Manuel_Mar=EDn?= <mmg@transtelco.net>,nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Also how are folks testing ddos protection? What lab gear,tools,methods are you using to determine effectiveness of the mitigation.
On January 8, 2015 11:01:47 AM CST, "Manuel Marín" <mmg@transtelco.net> wrote:
>Nanog group
>
>I was wondering what are are using for DDOS protection in your
>networks. We
>are currently evaluating different options (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus,
>RioRey) and I would like to know if someone is using the cloud based
>solutions/scrubbing centers like Imperva, Prolexic, etc and what are
>the
>advantages/disadvantages of using a cloud base vs an on-premise
>solution.
>It would be great if you can share your experience on this matter.
>
>Thank you
>
>!DSPAM:54aeb96d198072115716976!
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
