[177158] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Jan 2 13:34:15 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 20:27:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <28791241.19480.1420163823876.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart6711638.mFSpA1YT8q
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:57:41 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Running various functions on a couple small VM clusters
> makes a lot of sense.
We treat our CSR1000v RR's as dedicated islands. No other=20
functions run on them, nor do we cluster them.
Don't want what fun could arise :-)...
Mark.
--nextPart6711638.mFSpA1YT8q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=L3KM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart6711638.mFSpA1YT8q--
