[177145] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Tantsura)
Thu Jan 1 20:54:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 01:54:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <54A5C5A0.3040506@foobar.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
You don't need LDP on RR as long as clients support "not on lsp" flag (diff=
erent implementation have different names for it)
There are more and more reasons to run RR on a non router HW, there are man=
y reasons to still run commercial code base, mostly feature set and resilie=
nce.
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jan 1, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>=20
>> On 01/01/2015 21:37, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>> Are anyone using Bird, Quagga etc. for this?
>=20
> there are patches for both code-bases and some preliminary support for
> vpnv4 in quagga, but other than that neither currently supports either ld=
p
> or the vpnv4/vpnv6 address families in the main-line code.
>=20
> Nick
>=20
>=20
