[177120] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Charter ARP Leak
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Mon Dec 29 23:34:45 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: "Corey Touchet" <corey.touchet@corp.totalserversolutions.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 23:32:40 -0500
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F11A49202723141A08215952768DA36D31A001E@ORD2MBX05F.mex05.mlsrvr.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:41:45 -0500, Corey Touchet
<corey.touchet@corp.totalserversolutions.com> wrote:
> We'll I would for one be very interested if the 8 ARP packets a second
> count against the caps.
Depends on where and what counters they probe. I would assume they look at
"unicast" fields, so it wouldn't counted. (of course, *I* would use
netflow accounting, but I care about my data being accurate.)
--Ricky
