![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <40C6463F-E48B-4A2A-96C5-4C6E43122DCF@fastreturn.net> From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:07:44 -0800 To: Ammar Zuberi <ammar@fastreturn.net> Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org http://wireless.fcc.gov/signal-boosters/faq.html Matthew Kaufman (Sent from my iPhone) > On Dec 15, 2014, at 6:59 PM, Ammar Zuberi <ammar@fastreturn.net> wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Although this might not apply to you in the US, anyone else thinking about= trying this might want to check up on possible legal backlash from using on= e of these devices. I know you can't legally use one of these in Dubai. >=20 > Ammar >=20 >> On 16 Dec 2014, at 6:54 am, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: >>=20 >> In article <20141216024552.GA26200@esri.com> you write: >>> Hi all; >>>=20 >>> Looking to improve cell reception for mixed ATT/Verizon users on the >>> first floor of one of our buildings. >>>=20 >>> Starting to dig into this and coming across items like this one at >>> Amazon[1], but thought some of you out there might have recommendations >>> for something that has worked well for you and has been reliable. >>=20 >> The Wilson equipment has a good reputation. >>=20 >> Assuming you have good Internet service, you might also consider >> femtocells, which are small cellular base stations that use your >> Internet service as backhaul. >>=20 >> Verizon: http://www.verizonwireless.com/accessories/samsung-network-exten= der-scs-2u01/ >>=20 >> AT&T: http://www.att.com/att/microcell/ >>=20 >> R's, >> John
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |