[176863] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: automatic / intelligent fiber optic patch panel (iow SDN @ layer
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arnold Nipper)
Fri Dec 12 18:33:37 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 00:33:25 +0100
From: Arnold Nipper <arnold@nipper.de>
To: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil@gmail.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AD67EBBC-4C02-4C15-9D2E-BF65309D3B79@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--ClDTeOtvcvkhPBmGXK0bXxk5nCe9WrEiA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 11.12.2014 01:33, Phil Bedard wrote:
> Curious what the use case is where a photonic or L1 switch wouldn't get=
=20
> the job done? =20
>=20
Just a matter of costs, Phil. Of course a photonic switch would also do
th job. But I neither need the speed of switching over nor all the other
features a photonic switch offers. Makes sense?
Arnold
--=20
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold@nipper.de phone: +49 6224 5593407 2
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 5593407 9
--ClDTeOtvcvkhPBmGXK0bXxk5nCe9WrEiA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAlSLe0UACgkQrz6CwpRB/EyPswCdGd9O17q3Z2yJSRKNxobFfXaY
QMkAnRMFIQ7IE3l/3o9T9CDYmZ8Ruf2d
=fozm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ClDTeOtvcvkhPBmGXK0bXxk5nCe9WrEiA--
