[176846] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Karrenberg)
Fri Dec 12 06:37:27 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:37:17 +0100
From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2bnnakkcb.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On 11.12.14 21:22 , Randy Bush wrote:
> note that free.fr does this in france.  we both provide and use it
> there.  works out quite well.


Another data point: several cable broadband providers do this in NL. My 
personal experience is with Ziggo. Imho they do it right:

	- opt-in, at least when I joined as an early adopter
	- you do get roaming privileges yourself if you opt-in
	- full WPA authentication
	- each customer has their individual authentication info
	- back-haul is via a separate DOCSIS connection
		- no leakage
		- no bandwidth loss on your subscription
		- no liability for what roamers do

This to me is acceptable. In practice I have turned it off by default on 
my phone and I rarely roam as 3G/4G charges are also reasonable. I found 
it to be annoying when quality varies as it roams from 3G to Wifi and 
Wifi to Wifi. But I do manually turn it on occasionally when stationary 
and doing a lot of data.

Daniel



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post