[17678] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: $110,000 for Gated Source Code
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex P. Rudnev)
Tue Jun 9 04:33:52 1998
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 12:16:54 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Alex P. Rudnev" <alex@Relcom.EU.net>
To: Scott Mace <smace@intt.ORG>
cc: brad <brad@poofy.tbn.tm>, rmeyer@mhsc.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199806080703.CAA01311@metal.intt.org>
There is ONLY (ONLY) two well-debugged and wideworld checked router
implementation now - first is CISCO IOS, second is GATED.
First is checked over million CISCOs, second was
checked
by MERIT's back-bone, by a lot of ISP who used gated for their host-based
routers, and now by those vendors who implemented gated into their
routers. I do not think it's an excellent product (through nothing is
excellent in the Internet), but in comparation to the other
implementation it's out of competition for now (remember a lot of
Internet bums caused by Wellfleet? RIP broadcast storms over the
inter-sea links caused by Annex? And so on...).
Through the world is changed every day.
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Scott Mace wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:39 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Scott Mace <smace@intt.ORG>
> To: brad <brad@poofy.tbn.tm>
> Cc: rmeyer@mhsc.com, nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: $110,000 for Gated Source Code
>
> I think you would be suprised at the number of commercial networking
> vendors that use GateD source code as the basis for their routing
> protocol suite...
>
> Scott
>
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
