[176735] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Got a call at 4am - RAID Gurus Please Read
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Dec 11 01:32:59 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAMfXtQxc2ViVVbyQZfhD6rFZ=kqRdzG=qSihFGYDn2pc5cgVTQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:32:29 +0900
To: Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
zfs and ganeti
--
Phones are not computers and suck for email
On December 11, 2014 2:39:19 PM GMT+09:00, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> We are now using ZFS RAIDZ and the question I ask myself is, why
>>> wasn't I using ZFS years ago?
>>
>> because it is not production on linux,
>
>Well, it depends on what you mean by
>"production". Certainly the ZFS on Linux
>group has said in some forums that it is
>"production ready", although I would say
>that their definition is not exactly the
>same as what I mean by the term.
>
>> which i have to use because
>> freebsd does not have kvm/ganeti.
>
>There is bhyve, and virt-manager can
>support bhyve in later versions (but is
>disabled by default as I recall). Not
>exactly the same, of course.
>
>> want zfs very very badly. snif.
>
>Anyone who really cares about their data
>wants ZFS. Some just do not yet know
>that they (should) want it.
>
>There is always Illumos/OnmiOS/SmartOS
>to consider (depending on your particular
>requirements) which can do ZFS and KVM.
