[176652] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Followup: Survey results for the ARIN RPA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sun Dec 7 21:40:34 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:40:23 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+khAbRtXOn-5EwTuta+HG8EOpw4B3FUuoHv89gvHu1ycxJHTA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> And there in lies my interest in all of this- there is little value in
> signing my org's routes if no one is going to validate them. It's a bit of
> an odd position in that I have a very high interest in what the rest of the
> community thinks of and how they act with respect to the RPA. In other
> words, your relationship with ARIN is now of concern to me.
>
> Maybe I'm being naively optimistic in thinking that these are solvable
> problems.
there is the rest of the world, it is a global internet. the north
american influence decreases continuously, some because of growth of the
global internet, which is a good thing. some because of noam making
itself less and less relevant, as you point out.
take a look at
http://archive.psg.com://rpki-rollout.jpg
kinda tells you what's happening, eh? lacnic has more roll-out than
arin, and proportionally it is even more impressive; over 20% of lacnic
allocations have roas. and there is ripe, with the sheer numbers.
randy
