[176580] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Dec 4 14:49:16 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0800."
<6D5B5048-656D-408A-B975-A9E841D92942@pch.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:48:49 -0500
Cc: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1417722529_2125P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:28:42 -0800, Bill Woodcock said:
> > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > Orders of magnitude? Seriously? I can buy it costs 2x or 3x.
> > But an additional 2 or 3 zeros on the price?
> Yep, thats why all this is at issue. If it were cheap, and
> worked, like in-addr or whois, there wouldn't be an issue, would
> there?
So why does an RPKI request cost *500 times* as much as (say) a request
to assign an address block? Why is it *that* much more expensive to handle?
--==_Exmh_1417722529_2125P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=HlHr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1417722529_2125P--
