[176570] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Seastrom)
Thu Dec 4 14:11:46 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Robert Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0BDD494-10A5-4768-B6EF-D516ABD35786@pch.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:11:35 -0500
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: Robert Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>, NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Dec 4, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
>=20
>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 10:17 AM, George, Wes <wesley.george@twcable.com> =
wrote:
>> WG] Has there been any actual discussion about how much "nobody" =
would
>> have to pay for ARIN (or another party) to fix the balance of =
liability
>> and provide a proper SLA that led to "no, I don't want to pay for =
that"
>> responses from those who are expressing the concern, or is this just
>> conjecture on your part?
>=20
> I=92ve asked a lot of people, =93Would you be willing to pay ARIN for =
RPKI services,=94 and the answer has always been =93no.=94 Until I get =
a =93yes,=94 it=92s hard to put a number (other than zero) on how the =
market values RPKI. So, asking how much more risk ARIN is willing to =
take on seems a little premature.
I suspect you would get a similar answer if you asked people "Would you =
be willing to pay ARIN for whois services" or "would you be willing to =
pay ARIN for in-addr.arpa services".
I've always been under the impression that the fees charged annually to =
my orgid were in part to cover the costs associated with running the =
registry, which by definition involves a certain amount of risk. Am I =
mistaken?
-r
