[176557] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carlos M. Martinez)
Thu Dec 4 12:13:03 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:12:49 -0200
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com>, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>,
Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <54808CF4.50101@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: carlos@lacnic.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hello,
On 12/4/2014 2:33 PM, Andrew Gallo wrote:
>
> On 12/4/2014 11:22 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> Understood and good point. I've heard rumblings of setting up a
> non-ARIN TAL, though I wonder what the value is in separating RPKI from
> the registry. Wouldn't this put us in the same position we're in with
> routing registries (with respect to data quality)?
>
Exactly the same. RPKI without the tie-in to the registration database
is just another random database, like the dozens that are out there,
bound to suffer from exactly the same problems current IRRs suffer.
Disclaimer: I work for LACNIC, but in this case, if I was a beggar
playing music at subway stations my opinion would be exactly the same.
Cheers!
Carlos
