|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:35:59 -0500 From: Andrew Gallo <akg1330@gmail.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu In-Reply-To: <44004.1417705448@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org Honestly, that's what I'm trying to figure out as well. In my informal conversations, what I got was that lawyers read the agreement, said 'no, we wont sign it' and then dropped it. If specific legal feedback isn't making it back to ARIN, then we need to start providing it, otherwise, the agreement will stand. On 12/4/2014 10:04 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:57:05 -0500, Andrew Gallo said: > >> In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a >> number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying >> Agreement. > Do we have a handle on *why* organizations are having issues with the > agreement?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |