[176472] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Low-numbered ASes being hijacked? [Re: BGP Update Report]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Sun Nov 30 14:43:37 2014

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 14:43:30 -0500
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
In-Reply-To: <547B3D63.9080707@winterei.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:53:07AM +0900, Paul S. wrote:
> Do these people never check what exactly they end up originating 
> outbound due to a config change, if that's really the case?

Of course not because their neighbors are allowing it to 
pass; so as with all hijacks, deaggregation, and other 
unfiltered noise, the only care is traffic going in and 
out. QA (let alone automated sanity checks) are alien
concepts to many, and "well it works" is the answer from 
some when contacted.  

It smells like this is as PF surmises and might just be 
folks amenable to fixing it when contacted. We'll see...

Cheers!

Joe

-- 
        RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / CotSG / Usenix / NANOG

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post