[176333] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: determine relationship between the operators based on import
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Waites)
Tue Nov 25 11:58:49 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:58:05 +0000 (GMT)
To: m4rtntns@gmail.com
From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJx5YvF-ctprfzhAZ8VK0tfcjDWOzDqrRFArn5+FkDaqrPpQ3g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
----Security_Multipart(Tue_Nov_25_16_58_05_2014_899)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:36:47 +0200, Martin T <m4rtntns@gmail.com> said:
> Last but not least, maybe there is altogether a more reliable
> way to understand the relationship between the operators than
> aut-num objects(often not updated) in RIR database?
The first thing to do is look and see if the policy of, e.g. AS65133
is consistent with what you see there. I suspect you'll find a lot of
mismatches but I don't know if that has been studied systematically,
but it should be simple to do.
Next, much more data intensive, is trawl through the route views data
and see to what extent the actual updates seen are consistent with the
RIR objects, and also see what (topological, not financial as Valdis
points out) relationships they imply that are not present in the RIR
database.
-w
----Security_Multipart(Tue_Nov_25_16_58_05_2014_899)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=yY4A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----Security_Multipart(Tue_Nov_25_16_58_05_2014_899)----
