[176257] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Incident notification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derek Andrew)
Fri Nov 21 11:05:06 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:56:49 -0600
From: Derek Andrew <Derek.Andrew@usask.ca>
In-reply-to: <7d505a64b2cb49bda61beeb3b11f63d8@CAMPUSCAS4.usask.ca>
To: Thijs Stuurman <Thijs.Stuurman@is.nl>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
While we do not do this ourseleves, I wonder why we would not use Twitter.
You can receive SMS, or texts in the app on a smart phone, or look at a
webpage. You can make them private and have lots of subscribers. I find
Twitter more reliable that our local SMS providers too.
d
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Thijs Stuurman <Thijs.Stuurman@is.nl>
wrote:
> Nanog list members,
>
> I was looking at some statistic and noticed we are sending out a massive
> amount of SMS messages from our monitoring systems.
> This left me wondering if there isn't a better (and cheaper) alternative
> to this, something just as reliant but IP based. We all have smartphones
> these days anyway.
>
> Therefore my question, what are you using to notify admins of incidents?
>
> Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Thijs Stuurman
>
>
>
> [IS Logo]
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> IS Group
>
> Wielingenstraat 8
>
> T
>
> +31 (0)299 476 185
>
> info@is.nl<mailto:info@is.nl>
>
> 1441 ZR Purmerend
>
> F
>
> +31 (0)299 476 288
>
> www.is.nl<http://www.is.nl>
>
> ________________________________
>
> IS Group is ISO 9001:2008, ISO/IEC 27001:2005, ISO 20.000-1:2005, ISAE
> 3402 certified. De datacenters zijn PCI DSS en ISO 14001 compliant.
>
>
>
--
Copyright 2014 Derek Andrew (excluding quotations)
+1 306 966 4808
Information Systems
University of Saskatchewan
Peterson 120; 54 Innovation Boulevard
Saskatoon,Saskatchewan,Canada. S7N 2V3
Timezone GMT-6
Typed but not read.
