[176255] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Incident notification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Huff)
Fri Nov 21 10:56:58 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
To: Thijs Stuurman <Thijs.Stuurman@is.nl>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:56:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BFB0F9A20B1ADF418B7E13F088AB8577165FC20D@IS-EXCH-TEMP.office.is.nl>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The advantage of SMS is that it is out of band. Any smtp or other IP based =
solution requires a stable and working network environment, which is what t=
he alert may be trying to tell you is down.
----
Matthew Huff=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations=A0=A0=A0| Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management LLC=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 | Fax:=A0=A0 914-694-5669
-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Thijs Stuurman
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:52 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Incident notification
Nanog list members,
I was looking at some statistic and noticed we are sending out a massive am=
ount of SMS messages from our monitoring systems.
This left me wondering if there isn't a better (and cheaper) alternative to=
this, something just as reliant but IP based. We all have smartphones thes=
e days anyway.
Therefore my question, what are you using to notify admins of incidents?
Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet,
Thijs Stuurman
[IS Logo]
________________________________
IS Group
Wielingenstraat 8
T
+31 (0)299 476 185
info@is.nl<mailto:info@is.nl>
1441 ZR Purmerend
F
+31 (0)299 476 288
www.is.nl<http://www.is.nl>
________________________________
IS Group is ISO 9001:2008, ISO/IEC 27001:2005, ISO 20.000-1:2005, ISAE 3402=
certified. De datacenters zijn PCI DSS en ISO 14001 compliant.
