[176166] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ryanL)
Mon Nov 17 15:09:32 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <9578293AE169674F9A048B2BC9A081B401572055E9@MUNPRDMBXA1.medline.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:09:21 -0800
From: ryanL <ryan.landry@gmail.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
there's a reason why cisco introduced "service unsupported-transceiver",
which still remains an undocumented command. i have arista gear as well.
kinda wish they had a similar undocumented command.
