[176151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Route Science
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pawel Rybczyk)
Sun Nov 16 05:34:46 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:34:36 +0100
From: Pawel Rybczyk <nogs@border6.com>
To: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>, Clayton Zekelman <clayton@mnsi.net>
In-Reply-To: <3799-b6.nogs.nanog-16112014031002-63@news.border6.com>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: pawel.rybczyk@border6.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hi,
Thanks for mentioning our name.
Our platform does routing optimization but also includes plug & play
monitoring and reporting tools for network troubleshooting and planning.
You can check our brochure at:
http://www.border6.com/files/Border6_NSI_en.pdf
Do not hesitate to contact me off-list, I’ll provide documentation and
can run live demo.
--
Regards,
Pawel Rybczyk
Regional Manager
BORDER 6 sp. z o.o.
pawel.rybczyk@border6.com
office: +48 22 242 89 51 (ext.103)
mobile: +48 664 300 375
On 11/16/2014 04:03 AM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Clayton Zekelman <clayton@mnsi.net> wrote:
>
> I would also wonder if someone has more details about how useful and
> good the Avaya/Routescience are in practice after significant time in
> deployment in the real world on a large network, were they worth
> whatever the price tag was to get and maintain ?
>
> Oh, and how about Border6 ? I believe they have marketing language
> claiming to be able to achieve some similar things, in regards to
> automatic path optimizations and rerouting. :)
>
>>
>> http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240046663/Google-chooses-RouteScience-Internet-technology
>
> Yeah, there are always great news stories. But media tends to
> exagerate things, and I think when it comes to enterprise products
> it's strictly promotional. When was the last time you heard a
> followup news story on one of those sorts of things 1yr later about
> BigCo dropped "Vendor X" product because they felt it's no longer
> worth it, the savings were less than expected and did not exceed the
> cost of the product, the actual thing fell short of marketing claims,
> or didn't actually work out so well, etc, etc.
>
>
>
>>
> --
> -JH
>
