[176052] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Tue Nov 11 01:27:38 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:27:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZfAkRYd6D36_0HqK7QxO-Gm3LSq+Agr_3QFMku6R+eWg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nextPart4274199.FS3M7sNRIE
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 01:00:54 AM Christopher Morrow=20
wrote:
> why thought? Justification is really about having a use
> for the ips, right? and if you have 500
> servers/network-devices ... then you have justification
> for a /23 ... it seems to me.
Unless Equinix have an actual product called OoB, in which=20
case it automatically comes with a /30, or /126.
Mark.
--nextPart4274199.FS3M7sNRIE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=qi/m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart4274199.FS3M7sNRIE--
