[176032] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alistair Mackenzie)
Tue Nov 11 00:34:38 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CANdN9jYtaXeg-mcmAB8obaLNP_wdPQdK2yCA27_DNDHZXr0dFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:38:55 +0000
From: Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata@gmail.com>
To: Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
> public IP.
>
> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on
> cheap and on-net.
>
> Cheers
> /Ruairi
>
