[175996] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Nov 11 00:04:36 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <A000DC58-0E3E-483D-BE5B-FA3E4A385FAA@pch.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
because a /23 of ipv6 is very large.... :)
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it.=
..
#fios
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
> Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
>
>
> -Bill
>
>
>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 15:02, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. <contact@winterei.se> wrote:
>>> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
>>> justification these days, sadly.
>>
>> why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips,
>> right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have
>> justification for a /23 ... it seems to me.
>>
>>>
>>> Good luck nonetheless.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2014 =E5=8D=88=E5=BE=8C 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
>>>> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but d=
ue
>>>> to
>>>> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>>>>
>>>> /Ruairi
>>>>
>>>>> On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giv=
ing
>>>>> you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
>>>>>
>>>>> OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear List,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling=
to
>>>>>> find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of abo=
ut
>>>>>> 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We h=
ad
>>>>>> hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a sin=
gle
>>>>>> public IP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is =
on
>>>>>> cheap and on-net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> /Ruairi
>>>
