[175796] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Seastrom)
Sun Nov 2 20:10:47 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
From: Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 20:08:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7AK2Vae4ZZBX1QMMgES-wRXz86bUUBY6bJv5GV2kk9qwg@mail.gmail.com> (Baldur
Norddahl's message of "Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:52:04 +0100")
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> writes:
> On 1 November 2014 23:18, Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> wrote:
>
>> Where on the public Internet?
>>
>> Do networks run by organizations such as SITA, ARINC, BT Radianz, UK
>> MOD, and US DOD that use globally unique space and may interconnect
>> with each other in some way (and could hypothetically be using
>> IRR-type structures to describe that routing policy though I don't
>> think the military does that) get their objects unceremoniously booted?
>>
>
> Why would I want routes from US DOD in my filters, if this stuff is not
> supposed to be on the public internet? That is a waste of everyones
> ressources.
If you (and they) use the full capabilities of RPSL... you won't.
-r
