[175650] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Mon Oct 27 12:39:00 2014
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD-DQxS8YNFEvHSqp+fDCuNx28tFE3AMQ_kVnFSeWKB-7d=EOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Ollie" <jeff@ocjtech.us>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I will stipulate this use case.
> >
> > I will counter with "you wouldn't be running a "real" distro in that
> > case anyway; you'd be running something super trimmed down, and
> > possibly
> > custom built, or based on something like CoreOS, that only does one
> > job.
> >
> > Well. :-)
>
> From: https://coreos.com/using-coreos/systemd/
>
> "CoreOS uses systemd as the core of its distributed init system,
> fleet. Systemd is well supported in many Linux distros, making it
> familiar to most engineers. Every aspect of CoreOS is deeply
> integrated with systemd."
Surprisingly, I actually knew this already.
You might want to stop trying to score points, rather than actually, y'know,
just advancing the conversation.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
